Welcome to the June edition of our newsletter. Much of this year has been spent on reviewing and consulting on revised standards, codes and guidelines that have been in force since July 2010. The consultation phase enables the broader profession and interested stakeholders to provide input into the standards that underpin the regulation of podiatry in Australia. I encourage all registrants to take an active interest in this process as your participation is greatly valued.
In May, the Podiatry Board of Australia (the Board) held its board meeting in Hobart as part of our strategy to meet with key stakeholders in different jurisdictions and, where possible, present to podiatrists at local professional events. In March this year the Board hosted a well-attended breakfast forum in Melbourne which coincided with the local association conference. These meetings enable an information exchange on the Board’s expectations with respect to professional conduct and practice, and alert practitioners to upcoming consultations and the release of new standards, codes and guidelines for the profession. The Board thanks the state associations for the opportunity to participate in these worthwhile events.
Chair, Podiatry Board of Australia
back to top
The Podiatry Board is consulting on the following revised draft registration standards and related guidelines that set requirements for:
The Board has not proposed major changes and the draft standards are broadly similar to the current registration standards. The proposed changes reflect feedback from registrants and other stakeholders and the Board has also considered its experience with the standards over the past four years of operating in National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (the National Scheme). The language in the revised registration standards has been simplified and the standards restructured to make them clearer.
The consultation paper can be found on the Current consultations page on the Board’s website.
Written submissions are required by close of business on Monday, 14 July 2014. We encourage you to provide feedback on the proposed standards and guidelines.
The Podiatry Board is consulting on revised draft guidelines for infection control.
The Board has not proposed major changes and the revised guidelines are broadly similar to the current guidelines. The review has given the Board the opportunity to improve the guidelines by revising the language and structure to make them clearer and easier to understand.
Written submissions are required by close of business on Monday, 14 July 2014. We encourage you to provide feedback on the proposed guidelines.
The Board has published four new documents. These are the:
View the new documents on the Board’s website under Policies, codes and guidelines.
The Board reviewed the code, the advertising guidelines and the mandatory notifications guidelines as part of a scheduled review three years into the National Scheme. The Social media policy is new. It does not change the basic obligations that practitioners must meet, but explains how the obligations that already exist in the National Law and the Code of conduct apply to social media. The basic principle is that the same expectations apply to your behaviour wherever it occurs – online or in person.
The guidelines and the Social media policy are common across all the 14 professions regulated in the National Scheme and apply to all registered health practitioners. The shared Code of conduct is common to most National Boards.
The Board encourages you to make sure you are familiar with these documents. They are the standards the Board uses to assess concerns about the professional conduct, performance or health of registered podiatrists. You should also be aware of your legal obligations under the National Law, in relation to mandatory reporting and advertising.
The Code of conduct contains important standards in relation to:
The requirements about advertising are set out in the National Law. The Guidelines for advertising regulated health services (Advertising guidelines) explain these legal requirements and do not add new obligations. The guidelines have been reorganised to make them clearer and easier to understand. The basic obligations that practitioners must meet have not changed.
Since publishing the revised Advertising guidelines in March 2014 the Podiatry Board and other National Boards have acted on the feedback they received about the guidelines and an updated version has been published on the Board’s website. The guidelines were edited to make them clearer, particularly that:
The Guidelines for mandatory notifications explain the mandatory notifications requirements of the National Law. Most of the guidelines have not changed. Some words have been refined or added to make the meaning clearer. The content has not changed significantly and there are no new obligations in the guidelines.
More information about the new documents is available on the Board’s website.
Have your say on accreditation and competency standards for the podiatry profession.
The Australian and New Zealand Podiatry Accreditation Council (ANZPAC) have begun their scheduled review of the Accreditation Standards for Podiatry Programs for Australia and New Zealand (PDF) and the Podiatry Competency Standards for Australia and New Zealand (PDF).
ANZPAC is the independent accreditation authority for the podiatry profession and undertakes the accreditation functions under the National Law, which includes accrediting education providers and programs of study for the podiatry profession in Australia and New Zealand. Entry-level podiatry programs are accredited using the entry-level program accreditation standards, which specify the criteria against which podiatry programs are evaluated. The ANZPAC podiatry competency standards are used for a range of purposes, including program accreditation, and describe the professional attributes and core competencies of entry-level podiatrists.
This review is being conducted to ensure that both sets of standards continue to represent contemporary best practice, benchmark well against other health profession standards nationally and internationally and remain relevant and effective over time. Throughout the review, ANZPAC is undertaking wide-ranging consultation and invites comment from all interested parties including registered podiatrists.
Details of the review are available from the ANZPAC standards review webpage, along with an initial consultation survey where you can tell ANZPAC your views on a range of important issues relating to these standards.
The Board’s Continuing professional development (CPD) registration standard requires podiatrists to complete training through a registered training organisation (RTO) that includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), management of anaphylaxis and use of an automated external defibrillator. The CPR component must be updated every 12 months. Podiatrists must have a current Certificate of Attainment issued by an RTO as evidence that they have successfully completed the training.
The Board is aware that revised assessment requirements for recognised CPR training packages include the requirement for CPR to be performed on a resuscitation manikin placed on the floor.
The Board has agreed that as a matter of policy, an exemption may be granted from the requirement to successfully complete CPR training for podiatrists who are physically unable to perform CPR on a manikin placed on the floor.
The Board still expects practitioners to undertake the CPR training delivered by an RTO and understands that if a candidate is unable to complete the resuscitation manikin part of the assessment, an RTO may issue a certificate of attendance as an indication of participation in the course. However, the issuing of such a certificate is up to the individual RTO.
An application to the Board for such an exemption would need to be accompanied by:
It is the responsibility of the practitioner to check with the RTO before attending the training whether the RTO will issue a certificate of attendance if the practitioner cannot perform CPR on a manikin on the floor.
The Policy on exemption from CPD requirements is published on the Board’s website under Policies, codes and guidelines. The Board is updating this document to reflect this new policy.
In March 2008, when Commonwealth and state and territory governments all signed the agreement which underpins the National Scheme, they agreed that it should be reviewed after three years of operation.
The review of the National Scheme will examine whether the scheme is meeting the objectives set out in the National Law and will consider benefits and costs. The Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council (AHMAC) has now published the terms of reference for the review.
It will be conducted independently of National Boards and AHPRA and former director of WA Health Kim Snowball has been appointed to independently lead the review. Kim has held a variety of senior leadership roles in both the public and private health sectors, and was previously director general of WA health. Kim has also served as chair of AHMAC.
National Boards and AHPRA will be participating in the review and making submissions in the months ahead.
The Board has received correspondence from the Queensland Minister for Health, the Hon. Lawrence Springborg, advising that he has approved amendments to the Queensland Health (Drugs and Poisons) Regulation 1996 (regulations) to enable suitably qualified podiatrists holding an endorsement for scheduled medicines to prescribe medicines from the National Podiatry Scheduled Medicines List.
The proposed amendments have not been enacted as yet and podiatrists must ensure that they continue to comply with the current regulations until such time as the amended regulations come into force.
As mentioned in our recent communiqués and news items, practitioner audit has commenced to assess compliance with the registration standards for the profession. A new Audit page has been published on the Board’s website: this provides comprehensive information about the audit process including guidance on the audit notice, what is being audited, what it means for you and contact details for the audit team and AHPRA customer service team that can assist you with any queries.
Audits of random samples of practitioners from all professions will occur periodically throughout the year. If you are selected for audit you will be required to provide further information to support your registration declarations.
In early May the Board published its March 2014 data summary profiling Australia’s podiatry workforce, including a number of statistical breakdowns about registrants. These include state/territory, age and gender by registration type, principal place of practice, specialties and endorsements.
The new data show there are 4,108 podiatrists registered in Australia, an increase of 111 practitioners since the previous quarterly update (December 2013). Of this total, 4,003 hold general registration as a podiatrist, 78 hold non-practising registration and 27 hold both general and specialist registration as a podiatric surgeon.
There are 60 practitioners endorsed for scheduled medicines. See the tables below for further details.
Table 1 – Podiatrists: state and territory by registration type (March 2014)
Table 2 – Podiatrists: endorsements by state and territory (March 2014)
Table 3 – Podiatrists: specialty by state and territory (March 2014)
Find the Podiatry Board of Australia’s registration statistics in the About section of our website.